Lady Jane News

You can still book tickets for the re-enactment of Katherine Parr’s funeral at Sudeley Castle on Sunday 9th September. Lady Jane was chief mourner at Katherine’s funeral in

Book tickets for re-enactment of Katherine Parr’s funeral in 1548. This event is part of the Queen Katherine Parr Quincentenary.

Sudeley Castle – Funeral Re-enactment with Dr David Starkey – Tickets now on sale!


Historian John Murphy (@john_murphycouk) is tweeting about the events of Queen Jane’s reign. You can follow him here:

@john_murphycouk

Posted in Events by Place, News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Catch Up

The Anne Boleyn Files has a guest article by Catherine Fletcher and On The Tudor Trail has an interview with her and a guest article.

The Anne Boleyn Files – Henry versus Catherine: Who’s Who in the Diplomacy by Catherine Fletcher

On the Tudor Trail – Interview with Catherine Fletcher

On the Tudor Trail In Italy


Nasim@NasimT has written a guest article for The Anne Boleyn Files about the Michael Sittow portrait that has been re-identified as Mary Tudor, sister of Henry VIII.

The Anne Boleyn Files – Katherine of Aragon or Mary Tudor? – The Re-identification of Michel Sittow’s Portrait of a Young Woman by Nasim Tadghighi


Natalie at ‘On the Tudor Trail’ has posted more about her trip to the UK.

On the Tudor Trail – The Boleyns at Pashley Manor

On the Tudor Trail – Anne Boleyn’s Childhood Home – Hever Castle

Posted in Portraits | Tagged | Leave a comment

‘Gold: Power and Allure Exhibition’

On Saturday I visited the ‘Gold: Power and Allure’ exhibition in London. The summer exhibition of the Goldsmith’s Company is well worth seeing.

DSCF4599
The Goldsmiths’ Hall

My main reason for going was the locket ring that belonged to Elizabeth I which is on public display for only the third time. However, there were also lots of other Tudor related items on view.

The 400 gold items also featured; rings containing the hair of Mary Tudor, a Queen Elizabeth I gold pendant, a pendant with a possible cameo of Mary Queen of Scots, a cross that belonged to Reginald Pole, coins from each of the Tudor reigns and coins from the Mary Rose.

The exhibition is on three floors and Elizabeth’s ring is on the third. It was amazing to see, firstly because it was worn by Elizabeth, secondly because of the workmanship involved and thirdly and most importantly because of the two portraits it contains.

I had to kneel down to get a closer look at the tiny portraits (due to the angle of the second portrait in the open ring). It is amazing how small they are. Elizabeth’s is quite clear to make out but the other portrait isn’t. The gallery attendant told me I could borrow a magnifying glass to get a closer look. This gave a slightly clearer view and I was able to make out the French hood and the hair but that was about it. Still worth seeing though!

I chatted to the attendant and he said that during the week a woman had dashed into the exhibition and asked ‘Where is the ring?’ He had to ask which ring, as there are a number on display but soon ascertained that it was Elizabeth’s ring that she wanted to see.

(c) Chequer’s Estate

Queen Elizabeth I’s Ring
‘Gold, mother-of-pearl, rubies and enamel c1560.

According to tradition the ring was dedicated to James I (James VI of Scotland) as evidence of the Queen’s death and given by him to the 1st Earl of Home in 1603.

The bezel in the form of a locket is set with two enamelled portrait reliefs, one of Queen Elizabeth I, the other of a lady (Anne Boleyn?)’

Ring set with the hair of Mary Tudor (1496-1533).
Gold, hair, ivory and rock crystal, English 1784.

The ring is set with an ivory plaque under rock crystal on which has been arranged the hair of Mary Tudor, Queen of France (18 March 1496-25 June 1533). The back of the ring is engraved Mary Queen of France died 1533.

After a number of moves her body was interred at St Mary’s Church in Bury St Edmunds. However, before it was finally laid to rest her coffin was opened on 6th September 1784 and various items taken. These included cuttings of her hair which was found to be conspiculously red and more than 2 inches long. The small lock of hair in this ring was cut from it.’

Ring set with the hair of Mary Tudor.
‘Gold, hair and glass, English c1784.

Another example of a souvenir taken from Mary Tudor’s tomb.

Queen Elizabeth I Pendant Gold and cameo c1600
‘Pendant gold, cameo, gems, turquoise, pearls and enamel c1573’

Pendant enclosing a cameo possibly of Mary Queen of Scots c 1570

‘ The back is decorated with 3 pendant baroque pearls, some stones replaced c 1720. Given by Mary Queen of Scots to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk then by descent.’

Pectoral Cross
‘Gold and enamel and rubies 1550.

‘This cross is said to have belonged to Cardinal Reginald Pole (1500-1558).’

Coins

Henry VII (1485-1509) Half Angel

Henry VIII (1509-1547) Sovereign

Edward VI (1547-1553) Sovereign

Mary I (1553-1558) Sovereign

Elizabeth I (1558-1603) Pound

Sovereign Henry VII (1485-1509)
Minted at the Tower of London

‘Henry VII created new high quality coins which demonstrated how England saw itself as an economic force. In 1489 he introduced the sovereign.’

George Noble Henry VIII c1526

‘In 1526 Henry VIII introduced the george noble, which showed St George spearing a dragon.

Pound Elizabeth I
1565, minted at the Tower of London

‘Elizabeth I restored the value of the coinage, after Henry VIII’s Great Debasement (1542-1551) with new gold pieces worth a pound, 10s, 5s, and 2s 6d.’

Coins from the Mary Rose

‘On 19th July 1545 the Mary Rose, pride of Henry VIII’s fleet, sank as she defended England from a French invasion force. She was not a treasure ship, the coinage carried on board would have been personal money carried for pay and expenses. It is not surprising that only 27 high-value gold coins were found on the ship, including these.’

Angel, Henry VIII, 1st Coinage 1509-1526 x 2

Crown of the Double Rose, Henry VIII, 3rd Coinage 1526-44

Crown of the Double Rose, Henry VIII, 2nd Coinage 1526-44

Half Sovereign, Henry VIII, 3rd Coinage 1544-5 x 2

The exhibition leaflet does not mention the ring or have a photo of it. It does have a photo of a sovereign from the reign of Mary I and of the gold pendant with the cameo of Mary Queen of Scots. The book about the exhibition does not contain any photos of the ring either.

You can view some of the items on display at The Jewellery Editor website.

Opening hours

June 1 to July 28
Monday to Saturday
10am to 5pm
Closed Sundays and Bank Holidays (except Sunday June 24)

In all I managed to spend about 20 minutes viewing the ring. I kept going back when no one was looking at it but in the end my husband had to drag me away. The exhibition runs until 28th June and as I work only 20 minutes away from Goldsmiths’ Hall, I think another visit is in order!

All italics are quotes from the exhibition

Further Information:

The Goldsmiths’ Company

The Goldsmiths’ Company – Gold: Power and Allure Exhibition

Posted in Exhibitions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Guest post at The Anne Boleyn Files – 10th July – Jane the Quene

Claire Ridgway (author and creator of The Anne Boleyn Files) is very kindly hosting an article I wrote about Queen Jane’s arrival at the Tower of London on 10th July 1553.

Thank you Claire for asking me to write a piece for your amazing site.

The Anne Boleyn Files – 10th July 1553 – Jane the Quene

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

10th July 1553 – Jane in her own words

‘Although my fault is such that it can only be pardoned by the Queen’s mercy, nor can I ask for reprieve, having listened to those who at a time appeared to me as wise, and now have shown that they were not so, as they were distributing gifts that did not belong to them, and that I should not have accepted; for these reasons I should feel ashamed begging to be pardoned for such a crime. Nevertheless as I now avow my lack of prudence for which I deserve the greatest punishment, failing the mercifulness of the Queen, thus I hope that as my fault is great, making this avowal at least I shall not be accused of crimes in which I have not incurred. Because, although I accepted that of which I was not worth, I never sought it.’ (p.45, Malfatti)

Professor Eric Ives writes ‘A letter of explanation and confession to the queen is the one written appeal from Jane that would have been allowed, the August date is what one would expect, and remarks made by Mary to the imperial ambassador on the 13th indicate that she received such a letter.’ (p.19, Ives)

Two versions of Jane’s letter exist.

This is how Jane recounts the events of 10th July in her letter to Queen Mary.

Version 1

‘Then, as everybody knows, the following day I was brought to the Tower and shortly afterwards the Lord Great Treasurer gave me the jewels and brought also the Crown, without having been asked for it in my name, and he wanted me to try it on to see if it did become me. And as I refused, he told me that another would also be made to crown my husband as King; this suggestion aggrieved me and when the said Lord had left, I talked the matter over with my husband until he agreed that in case of he being made King, that would be by me and by act of Parliament. But afterwards I summoned the Earls of Arundel and Pembroke and told them if the Crown pertained to me, I should be pleased to make my husband a Duke, but I should never consent to make him a King. When that was reported to his mother she got very angry at me and induced her son not to sleep any more with me and he did it, telling me that he did not want to be a Duke, but King. So much so that in the end I was compelled to send to him the Earls of Arundel and Pembroke to persuade him to come to me; otherwise I knew that the following morning he would have gone to Sion. Thus I have been deceived by the Duke, by the Council and by my husband and ill treated by his mother; furthermore it is known that John Gates has avowed that he was the first to suggest to the King to name me as his successor. Apart from it I ignore what the Council might have decided to do, but know very well that twice I have envenomed the first one at the house of the Duchess and afterwards at the Tower. And that I state as witness of my own innocence.’ (p.45, Malfatti)

Version 2

‘On the day following (as is known to every one) I was conducted to the Tower, and shortly afterwards were presented to me by the Marquis of Winchester, lord high treasurer, the jewels, with which he also brought me the crown, although it had never been demanded from him by me, or by any one in my name ; and he further wished me to put it on my head, to try whether it really became me well or no. The which, although with many excuses I refused to do, he nevertheless added, that I might take it without fear, and that another also should be made, to crown my husband with me. Which thing, I, for my part, heard truly with a troubled mind, and with ill will, even with infinite grief and displeasure of heart. And after the said lord was gone, and I was reasoning of many things with my husband, he assented, that if he were to be made King, he would be made so by me, by act of parliament. But afterwards I sent for the earls of Arundel and Pembroke, and said to them that if the crown belonged to me, I should be content to make my husband a duke, but would never consent to make him king. Which resolution of mine gave his mother (this my opinion being related to her) great cause for anger and disdain, so that she, being very angry with me,’ and greatly displeased, persuaded her son not to sleep with me any longer as he was wont to do, affirming to me moreover that he did not wish in any wise to be a duke, but a king. So that I was constrained to send to him the earls of Arundel and Pembroke, who had negotiated with him to come from me, otherwise I knew, that the next morning he would have gone to Sion. And thus in truth was I deceived by the duke and the council and ill-treated by my husband and his mother. Moreover (as Sir John Gates has confessed) he (the duke) was the first to persuade King Edward to make me his heir. As to the rest, for my part, I know not what the council had determined to do, but I know for certain that, twice during this time, poison was given to me, first in tire house of the duchess of Northumberland, and afterwards here in the Tower, as I have the best and most certain testimony, besides that since that time all my hair has fallen off, and all these things I have wished to say, for the witness of my innocence, and the dis-burdening of my conscience.(p.487-498, Stone)

Ives, E. (2009) Lady Jane Grey: A Tudor Mystery, Wiley-Blackwell.

Malfatti, C.V. (1956) The Accession Coronation and Marriage of Mary Tudor as related in four manuscripts of the Escorial, Barcelona

Stone, J.M. (1901) The History of Mary I Queen of England, Sands & Co

Posted in Lady Jane in her own words | Tagged , | Leave a comment